SUFFRAGE FOR MIGRANTS

Share it:





Migrant workers from various parts of the country, engaged in the major infrastructure projects and construction industry across the State end up voiceless in the ongoing Lok Sabha elections as most of them cannot afford to travel back to their home State to exercise their franchise. They can’t join the festival of democracy in other states as they do not have valid identity proof to register as voters. This encapsulates the predicament of a strong migrant population of our country, estimated to be over 100 million (8.1 % of our total population).

Why does circular migration come about?

Current and prospective rates of job creation in Indian agriculture are poor, and the non-farm rural economy tends to grow only where agricultural growth is strong. For large parts of the country with unreliable farming or forest-based livelihoods, migration, with all its risks, offers better returns and better prospects for raising living standards than local employment.  But there are new attractions: labour intensive urban construction, manufacturing and mining, and a growing service industry attract people to distant destinations despite the risks and isolation from family that migration poses. There are also important non-economic reasons for migration which have so far received little attention. These include escaping oppressive caste relations and restrictive family environments, and the desire to experience city life. The devastation of agriculture in the last decade makes the problem more acute. Zero investment, collapse of employment, a rise in debt all are factors that have pushed millions more into the footloose army.


Majority of the migrant workers are based in Maharashtra and Gujarat followed by Tamil Nadu, Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka, Kerala and northern cities like Delhi and Punjab. According to established migratory patterns, in late April, one can find Biharis in Punjab/ Assam, Oriyas in Andhra Pradesh, Gujarat and Chhattisgarh, people from Tami Nadu on the road crews of Mumbai & workers from Rajasthan struggling in Gujarat. Those from North Karnataka scour Maharashtra for employment. In April-May, there are millions across India trying to scrape out a living away from home.



In areas where agriculture is dependent on Kharif, people leave in October and return before the rains, by June. Many travel short distances to vote in the Panchayat elections but for the Parliamentary elections, most of them do not return to vote. From Panchayat to Vidhan Sabha to Lok Sabha elections, participation dips 10.5 per cent at each step, notes the report ‘Political Inclusion of Seasonal Migrant Workers in India’. The most prominent reason given for women’s migration is marriage though.

Political censure:

For voting in any constituency, one requires a Voter ID card in which your address should be a part of that constituency. So, the primary requirement for a Voter ID card is an address proof.
Seasonal clash: Assuming that they hold voter ID cards, it is in April-May that quite a few distressed regions see their largest exodus of migrant labour. The timing of the polls ensures that none get to exercise their right.  
Unable to travel: Under informal working conditions, labourers hardly have a luxury of leaving for an election holiday which involves time, cost and an uncertainty of return. In a debt migration situation where two or more family members work in a facility, the owner sends the male member to return home for voting while he retains other members of the family as collateral so that the work doesn’t suffer and the male members return is ensured. 

No address proof: Many migrants lack proof of identity and proof of residence in the city. This is crucially linked to denial of right to housing in the city. Owing to lack of proper housing facilities, they dwell in informal settlements & are unable to obtain a proof of residence. Also, since most of them work in the informal sector, they are unable to get a proof of identity from their employer. This turns out to be the biggest barrier to their inclusion. Owing to lack of proof of residence, many are not included in the voters’ lists and cannot exercise their right to vote. Lack of residential proof also leads to various forms of exclusion such as inability to open a bank account, get a ration card and driving licence etc. These are very important documents, because they give access to the benefits of different government programs. The recent UID (Unique Identification) project also insists on residential proof.

               The easiest way of getting an address proof is the transfer of ration card from the native place to their present residence. But most of the workers have their family in their native village, which are dependent on the subsidized provisions they get from the fair price shops. This makes it an unfeasible option. An early departure from the village also means that migrant youth lack all verifiable proof of their identity.



Holistic exclusion:

Migrants constitute a ‘floating’ and invisible population, alternating between source and destination areas and remaining on the periphery of society. Internal migration has been accorded very low priority by the government, and policies of the Indian state have largely failed in providing any form of legal or social protection to this vulnerable group. Owing to the highly mobile nature of their employment, migrant workers get excluded from the scope of both urban and rural policy design. This has a significant impact on their access to public amenities and welfare schemes. Serious citizenship issues arise as the state machinery does not allow a portability of basic entitlements. Regulations exclude migrants from access to legal rights, public services & social protection programs. They face numerous constraints, including inadequate housing, lower wages, hazardous work & deplorable living conditions apart from a latent political representation.




How can this be resolved?

Scheduling: School exam schedules are taken into account while planning election dates, and rightly so. (Even though those schedules are still based more on a British school calendar than on the Indian agriculture season). Similarly, the migration patterns can be taken into account. The time every rural Indian is most likely to be in his or her village is during the harvest season. That is the best chance to receive their vote. So, maybe, the election schedules can be weaved according to regional harvest practices.
Postal Ballot: While, the facility of postal ballot for government employees, police personnel involved in election duty & armed forces guarding our borders is available, we are yet to evolve a system to facilitate a level playing ground for the migrant labourers to cast their valuable vote. The provision of postal ballot was recently extended, successfully, to the displacedvictims of Muzaffarnagar & Mizoram riots respectively. A similar functionality could be availed by a transient & mushrooming migrant population but this would require the governments to provide an identity to the hordes of limbs bearing the state machinery.
Identity: Many of the migrants come under the debt migrant system and being harbored illegally by the middleman, they take an advance and move to the place of destination through the labour agent who makes sure that the people complete their work as per the agreement. Therefore, it becomes a nightmare for the receiving states to identify & locate them to repatriate the people back to their native place for voting or create a database for social & political inclusion. Establishing an identity & including them in the government records is preliminary to the social & political inclusion of migrants.

To assist the migrant workers & the government, several NGOs are providing a variety of services:     
·         
        Aajeevika Bureau is a specialised initiative based in southern Rajasthan that provides services and support to rural migrants. It is amongst the largest Indian migrant support programs covering 5 development blocks of Udaipur, Rajsamand and Dungarpur districts and 4 destinations of Gujarat and Rajasthan. These are regions from where seasonal out-migration is high and there is a high dependence of rural households on wages earned from migration. The services implemented by the Aajeevika Bureau include the following: Identity/ Counselling, skill training and information/ Financial services and inclusion.


·         PEPUS is a non-profit, non-governmental organization which operates in the state of Uttar Pradesh. It is engaged in strengthening the migrant community by providing them identity cards and counseling on the basic precautions before they migrate through the established Shramik Sahayata Kendra. Pepus is also imparting vocational training to the youth for creating better livelihood alternatives.
   




Sources/ Further reading:

·         Absentee voting in India
·         Oversees Absentee voting
·         The millions who cannot vote – P. Sainath (must read)
·         Odisha Migration







Share it:

article

articles

comparison

how to

Post A Comment:

0 comments: